Blog

The SDGs Aren’t Just for “Developing Countries” 

In 2015, all Member States of the United Nations adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as part of the 2030 Agenda.

These goals apply to all countries.

Not just developing nations.

SDG 10 calls for reduced inequalities — within countries.

SDG 11 calls for inclusive, safe and resilient cities.

SDG 3, 4 and 8 focus on health, education and economic participation.

SDG 13 addresses climate risk and adaptation.

Australia endorsed these commitments.

Which means they apply here.

What Do Global Standards Look Like on the Ground? 

If we apply the SDGs locally, we should be asking:

• Are commute times equitable relative to job access?
  
  

• Are heat-vulnerable suburbs receiving proportional canopy investment?
  
  

• Are young people transitioning smoothly from school to secure work?
  
  

• Is public infrastructure keeping pace with population growth?
  
  

These are not service delivery questions.

They are structural allocation questions.

When investment patterns consistently lag behind growth, that is not a coincidence — it is a systems issue.

Why Does This Matter for Western Sydney?  

Because inequality is not abstract.

It is spatial.

It shows up in:

• Commute times relative to job access
  
  

• Tree canopy distribution in heat-exposed suburbs
  
  

• Youth transitions between school and secure employment
  
  

• Health infrastructure per capita in growth corridors
  
  

• Public transport accessibility across LGAs
  
  

These are measurable indicators.

They can be mapped.

They can be compared.

And they can be assessed against global benchmarks.

Are We Measuring What We Say We Value?  

If SDG 11 commits us to inclusive cities, are we tracking access to opportunity across Western Sydney?

If SDG 10 commits us to reducing inequality, are we measuring regional investment gaps?

If SDG 13 commits us to climate action, are we prioritising the suburbs most vulnerable to extreme heat?

The SDGs are not symbolic.

They are accountability tools.

Why This Matters for Institutions and Funders 

For universities, philanthropic foundations and policy institutions, SDG alignment is not symbolic.

It strengthens:

• Measurement and reporting frameworks
  
  

• Cross-sector collaboration
  
  

• Comparable impact benchmarks
  
  

• Long-term systems reform narratives
  
  

The SDGs provide a shared language for accountability.

If Australia has endorsed global equity standards, then regional disparities must be measured against them.

Greater Western Sydney should not be framed solely as a growth corridor.

It should be assessed as a test case for whether advanced economies can reduce internal inequality.

Where GWSAN Sits 

The Greater Western Sydney Advocacy Network applies a spatial justice framework to:

• Transport equity

• Youth pathways

• Health-supportive environments

• Climate resilience

• Fair public investment

Our work focuses on mapping disparities, identifying structural gaps, and strengthening accountability.

Not through rhetoric.

Through data.

How This Connects to Our Submission to the Sydney Plan 

The proposed Sydney Plan presents a critical opportunity.

If Sydney is to grow over the next 20–30 years, it must do so in a way that reduces inequality — not redistributes it.

Our forthcoming submission will argue that:

• Regional infrastructure allocation must be transparently benchmarked
  
  

• Transport access should be assessed relative to job density and travel time
  
  

• Heat resilience and canopy targets must prioritise high-growth, high-vulnerability suburbs
  
  

• Youth pathways should be embedded into spatial planning, not treated as a separate social policy issue
  
  

These are not new ideas.

They are consistent with global standards Australia has already endorsed.

Aligning the Sydney Plan with the Sustainable Development Goals — particularly SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) — strengthens its credibility, measurability and long-term impact.

Greater Western Sydney should not simply absorb growth.

It should demonstrate how equitable growth is delivered.

Our submission will outline practical mechanisms to make that measurable.

Because strategic plans are only as strong as the standards they are held against.

🔗 Related: The Fair Share Framework: A New Way to Fund Infrastructure

What you can do

• Join the conversation: Share your views on our LinkedIn page.
  
  

• Contact decision-makers: Send this article to your local councillor or MP to highlight community support for smarter housing options.
  
  

• Stay informed: Sign up for our updates to get the latest on housing policy changes, community forums, and advocacy campaigns.

The Next Step 

If global commitments exist, regional outcomes should reflect them.

Greater Western Sydney deserves to be measured against the same standards Australia has already endorsed.

Because growth without equity is not progress.

And accountability without measurement is not reform.